Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Comparing Business Etiquette in France and Greece

Business Etiquette: France and Greece Engaging in the proper business etiquette is absolutely essential when travelling abroad: not only is it considered polite, but engaging in such a habit will empower one to accomplish what one wants with a higher degree of success. The proper etiquette will reassure your new European business associates (in this case French and Italian ones) that you understand and respect their cultural norms and that youre prepared to adhere to them to make dealings more comfortable for all people involved. Furthermore, the French in particular value rules and propriety; thus it becomes even more important to demonstrate that you have a command of these rules and codes (foreigntranslations.com, 2013). When conducting business in France, its important to place a premium on formality and respect. The following pillars of business etiquette are extremely important in France. For instance, avoiding exaggeration is of the utmost importance; the French almost never f ind it charming or amusing, but naà ¯ve, boastful or simply rude. Dont shy away from debate: the French like to see that one can make logical arguments and offer up a cohesive understanding of all viewpoints of a given issue (foreigntranslations.com, 2013). It also demonstrates to the ones business associates that one has command of a given issue. Bear in mind that the French have highly critical and highly analytical minds and can often change their minds very quickly (Morrison Conaway,Show MoreRelatedBohlander/Snell-Managing Hr24425 Words   |  98 Pagessuch as Sony or Toyota. â€Å"No matter what kind business you run, no matter what size you are, you’re suddenly competing against companies you’ve never heard of all around the world that make a very similar widget or provide a very similar service,† as one global manager put it. In fact, nearly threequarters of HR professionals from companies large and small in a wide range of industries and countries say they expect their company’s international business to grow in the coming years.1 Some of these companiesRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesTrust Others? 280 glOBalization! Forming International Teams in a Virtual World 291 Myth or Science? â€Å"Asians Have Less Ingroup Bias Than Americans† 292 An Ethical Choice Should You Use Group Peer Pressure? 294 Point/Counterpoint Affinity Groups Fuel Business Success 298 Questions for Review 297 Experiential Exercise Wilderness Survival 299 Ethical Dilemma Is Social Loafing Shirking? 300 Case Incident 1 Negative Aspects of Collaboration? 300 Case Incident 2 Herd Behavior and the Housing Bubble (and Collapse)Read MoreProject Mgmt296381 Words   |  1186 Pagesand Cases, Fifth Edition Seppanen, Kumar, and Chandra, Process Analysis and Improvement, First Edition Simchi-Levi, Kaminsky, and Simchi-Levi, Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies, Case Studies, Third Edition Sterman, Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for Complex World, First Edition Stevenson, Operations Management, 10th Edition Swink, Melnyk, Cooper, and Hartley, Managing Operations Across the Supply Chain, First Edition Thomke, Managing Product and ServiceRead MoreLibrary Management204752 Words   |  820 PagesHernon, Harold C. Relyea, Robert E. Dugan, and Joan F. Cheverie Library Information Systems: From Library Automation to Distributed Information Access Solutions Thomas R. Kochtanek and Joseph R. Matthews The Complete Guide to Acquisitions Management Frances C. Wilkinson and Linda K. Lewis Organization of Information, Second Edition Arlene G. Taylor The School Library Media Manager, Third Edition Blanche Woolls Basic Research Methods for Librarians Ronald R. Powell and Lynn Silipigni Connoway Library

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Project Management Methodology Organisations Projects

Question: Discuss about the Project Management Methodology for Organisations Projects. Answer: Methodology Definition To carry out a particular task, set of methodsare used to provide guidelines, which is termed as methodology. PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile, Waterfall, SDLC etc. are some of the methodologies that are used to manage projects in an organization. For the betterment of the project, there are three methodologies that are very important. Because these yield a streamline approaches for the activities during the execution of the project and help in delivering projects on time. They also provide steps to overcome challenges during the project. Some of these steps are related to budget issues, schedule, over-run and additional potential risk. Project Methodologies PMBoK and PRINCE2 PMBOK and PRINCE2 are two of the most important project management methodologies that are used to manage the project. PMBOK stands for project Management Body of Knowledge and Prince2 Stands for project controlled environment. These two have theirdistinguishes sets of methods which help in managing the project task (Rankins, 2009). The objective that is served by these two methodologies is similar in nature. They are designed and defined to manage the project with all required efforts. It helps in overcoming challenges during the working onthe project. There is a key feature that distinguished them from others. The veryfirst and the most important difference between both of them is that PRINCE2 is a methodology based on process. Whereas on the other hand, PMBOK is a knowledge based methodology. The roles are well defined in Prince2 as compare to PMBOK. PMBOK primarily focuses on the project managers responsibilities. He is the prime source who takes up all the responsibility of the task that has to be completed on time. He is the one who can lead to take measure when anything is wrong. Project manager is the in charge of risk management while working on a project. These risks are scope-creeps, schedule over-run, changes related to technological advancements, lack of resources etc. He is held into an account to resolve these obstacles. In PRINCE2 the role of PM is to be a mediator between board of member and the team. This is a cycle of reporting from team to the board members. Further, he discusses the issues and solution that needs to be taken when there is any risk to be faced. PMBOK is said to be more feasible than PRINCE2(Duncan, 2013). Project life cycle and project methodology PLC also known as Project Life Cycle includes a step by step presentation of project working from the very beginning and till the completion. Initiation, Planning, Delivering and closing are the stages the is included in the project. PRINCE2 methodologies and their methods are very closely staged with respect to the project life cycle. This cycle, begins with project initiation (Advantagelearning, 2016). This determines the primary objectives of the project coupled with the project briefing and risk estimation. There are stages when one has to adopt measures from a successful project management, which further leads to the timely delivery of project. Resulting into timely closing of the same. PMBOK also includes different stages of the PLC,however, owns its respective methods. These methods are teemed as Phases. Initiation phase is the first most phase in PMBOK that includes the feasibility in studying project. Second is the phase primarily related to planning that includes the defining scope and activities to plant out the whole project in respect to Budgeting and schedule estimation. Later third comes execution phase involves activities related to the developments of the ongoing projects as per the needs. During these phases, there are number of risks that will come up and this the same has to be handled by methods that are defined in PMBOK. Fourth phase is relatedto the controlling parameters. There might be times when number of changes are required or arises that need to be implemented or resourced. These are managed effectively and controlled in the phase of PMBOK (Collet, 2016). PMBOK and PRINCE2 are the two distinguished project management methodologies which has their own merits and demerits. These depend on a number of factors that take a selection of particular methodologies during the project. These include Project client, schedule of project, and etc. References Advantagelearning.co.uk. (2016).PRINCE2 2009 Methodology: Principles, Themes and Processes | Advantage Learning. [online] Available at: https://www.advantagelearning.co.uk/prince2/what-is-prince2.html [Accessed 11 Aug. 2016]. Collet, B. (2016).Bruno Collet: Comparing PMBOK and Prince2 in 1000 words. [online] Brunocollet.com. Available at: https://www.brunocollet.com/2013/01/comparing-pmbok-and-prince2-in-1000.html [Accessed 11 Aug. 2016]. Duncan, W. (2013).A Guide to Project management Body of Knowledge. 1st ed. [ebook] USA, pp.22-24. Available at: https://www2.fiit.stuba.sk/~bielik/courses/msi-slov/reporty/pmbok.pdf [Accessed 11 Aug. 2016]. Rankins, G. (2009).Comparing PMBoK and PRINCE2 in 2009. 1st ed. [ebook] Australia, pp.22-26. Available at: https://goalgroup.com.au/SiteFiles/goalgroupcomau//C007_ComparingPMBoKAndPRINCE2In2009.pdf [Accessed 11 Aug. 2016].

Monday, December 2, 2019

The Middle Ages Essays - Legal History, Trial By Ordeal,

The Middle Ages During the English middle ages law often took on the form of an ordeal. An ordeal is a method of trial in which the accused was given a physical test that could only be met successfully if he or she was "innocent" in the eyes of God. I will discuss specifically three types of ordeals that were commonly used. I -- Ordeal of White Hot Iron This ordeal was used to test a person's honesty. If a person was accused of lying to an official pertaining to a crime supposedly committed, then the individual would be given a choice. If the accused held the white hot iron and did not get burned by it then he was innocent. If the accused held the iron and was burned then he was considered to be guilty and then punished according to the law. The accused would also be held as guilty if he chose not to undertake the ordeal at all. II -- Ordeal of Fire This ordeal was the only ordeal administered to women accused of cheating on their husbands. The suspected woman, dressed in white cloth, was made to walk through fire. If the clothing singed or turned black, then she was guilty and faced punishment. III -- Trial by Combat Of all medieval ordeals, this one may be considered the most fatal. To settle a dispute in this manner the plaintiff and the defendant would agree to wage a combat with each other until the death. Armor, if allowed would be scanty and only a sword or dagger would be used. Often the event would be conducted in a public meeting place such as the town square. This led to the entertainment aspect of the ordeal. The townsfolk would often demand one arm tied behind the back or have weights tied around each leg to contribute to the fun of spectatorship. While these methods of trial may seem unjust or even cruel by today's standard they were widely accepted by the people on the basis on religious beliefs that God would reign as the supreme judge over the matter. However, rarely did one ever walk away from ordeal by white hot iron with an unblemished hand. And very few times did the "David" slay the "Goliath" in trial by combat. Yet the townsfolk continued to support these events, even after the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215 outlawed clerics to take part in the trials. The ordeals lasted unofficially until the early nineteenth century.